138x Filetype PPTX File size 1.15 MB Source: pmg.org.za
INTRODUCTION: STRATEGIC CONTEXT 1. Castle Control Board (CBB) Mandate 3. Alignment with national policy from Castle Management Act (1993) and strategic imperatives and other relevant Legislation 2. Four (4) strategic objectives: 4. The CCB manages the Castle on an enterprise-risk basis/partnerships Good Corporate Governance and Administration Develop the museum and interpretative 5. A regular, diligent process of heritage components risk assessment, risk register and Develop and promote the Castle as a mitigation i.e. going concern, heritage tourism destination revenue, safety & security, human Ensure broad, public accessibility resource management HIGHLIGHTS AND CHALLENGES The Clean Audit opinion from the AGSA Renovations, 350 Commemoration and A hugely successful 350 commemoration tourism: with the help of the MOD&MV – we programme managed this! Massive increase in publicity (559 million audience) Tourism revenue decrease (R3.9 vs APP target Highest recorded visitor totals in the history of the of R4.2 million) – new restaurant, kiosk, gift Castle (195 445) shops, increase in events and increase in entrance fees (1 Oct. 2017) mitigate this risk Expansion tangible heritage offerings (Centre for Memory, Healing & Learning, Four King’s statues, Utilization of the Surplus and its effect on Restitution Garden, Schools Legacy Project Mural, operations (Log Support of R3m mitigates this) Wall, & Virtual Tour) Lack of a one precinct-one management Savings on our maintenance budget system (ongoing) Very pro-active, well-trained and managed staff Security and SANDF guards (Colonel Feni component deployed a Major to oversee the troops) With the exception of one (1) KPI, we met or The R1.7 over-expenditure for 350- exceeded all 17 other. This during in an commemoration (although approved) – exceptionally busy, challenging year engaged Treasury SUMMARY OF ACTUAL PERFORMANCE AGAINST (2016/17 APP TARGETS) PERFORMANCE NUMBE UNDER/OVER MITIGATION AREA R OF KPI’S Administration and 4 All 4 on target (over expenditure of As revenues improve Good Corporate R1.3 on personnel the personnel cost: Governance operations will improve Preservation, 4 All 4 on target N/A interpretation and showcasing of the Castle’s History Maximizing Tourism 6 One (1) not met (tourism revenue) Revenue optimization potential plan is activated Increase public access 4 All 4 on target N/A and perception SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (2016/17 BUDGET) Programme/acti 2015/2016 2016/2017 vity/ Budget Actual (Over)/Under Budget Actual (Over)/Und objective Expenditure Expenditure Expenditure er Expenditur e R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 Administration 5 091 5 658 (567) 6 637 8 010 (1 373) through corporate governance Preservation 1 950 282 1668 369 260 109 and protection of military and cultural heritage Maximising the 130 10 120 41 30 11 Castle’s tourism potential Increased 1476 (1 146) 1 167 1 640 (473) public profile 330 and positive perception of the Castle TOTAL 7 501 7 426 75 8 214 9 940 (1 726)
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.