131x Filetype PDF File size 0.42 MB Source: www.olaniwunajayi.net
OCTOBER 2020 | NEWSLETTER AN APPRAISAL OF NETTING PROVISIONS UNDER THE COMPANIES AND ALLIED MATTERS ACT 2020 INTRODUCTION dishonour. These provisions as we had under the repealed Companies and Allied Matters Act, The new Companies and Allied Maters Act, CAP C20, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1 2020 (the Act or CAMA 2020), made 2004 (Repealed CAMA) created heightened significant amendments and introductions to risks and uncertainties with respect to the Nigerian companies’ laws, one of which is enforceability of netting provisions under the provision for statutory enforcement of derivative contracts entered into with Nigerian netting arrangements. counterparties in the event of insolvency of the In simple terms, netting can be described as Nigeria counterparty. Such uncertainties have the process of reconciling and setting off two however been addressed with the introduction or more obligations to achieve a reduced net of the netting provisions under the Act. We obligation between two parties. It is used in have in ensuing paragraphs discussed in financial contracts (such as derivative further details, the concept of netting vis-a-vis contracts), to mitigate credit, settlement and set-off, the scope of the netting provisions other risks, by aggregating two or more under the Act and appraisal of the implications obligations to achieve a reduced net obligation. of the netting provisions and its impact on Thus, with the introduction of the netting consummation of derivative contracts in the provisions under Chapter 28 of the Act, Nigeria country. became one of the countries which have NETTINGVIS-AVISSET-OFF statutorily provided for the enforcement of netting provisions in financial derivative Netting, even though used under the Act in the contracts. This is a departure from what was context of derivative contracts, is applicable in previously obtainable, where counterparties to respect of any contractual arrangement where derivative contracts placed reliance on the payment or delivery obligations subsist. Thus, sanctity of contracts and the believe that netting as a settlement mechanism is often Nigerian courts, where faced with the used in the financial markets, for the construction of a netting arrangement settlement and payment of competing rights or pursuant to a financial derivative contract, will interests between counterparties. Netting of uphold the terms of the contracts as agreed obligations is effected through an agreed between the parties. Of course, there was also process of termination and evaluation of the fact that the close-out netting arrangement contractual rights or interests and under the derivative contracts, were subject to consolidation to one single (or ‘net’) payment the Nigerian mandatory rules on insolvency from one party to another, thereby minimising such as the rules on fraudulent preference, the the overall credit and settlement risk. right of the liquidator to cherry pick contracts to honour and which onerous contracts to 1. Which repealed the Companies and Allied Matters Act, CAP C20, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 1 OCTOBER 2020 | NEWSLETTER Netting can take different forms: settlement parties which is discharged to the extent of the /payment, multi-branch, multilateral and close- other party’s monetary obligation. out netting. The focus is however on the two relevant types of netting for our purpose: What is important to note as between netting payment and close-out netting. and set-off is that the two concepts are legal techniques applied between persons with Payment/Settlement Netting involves mutual rights and liabilities, replacing gross aggregation of parties’ payment obligations positions with net positions. and reduction of the payment obligations of both parties into one payment balance to be NETTING PROVISIONS UNDER THE ACT paid by the party with outstanding payment ANDITSCOMPLIANCEMETRICSWITHTHE obligations. ISDA MODEL LAW AND LESSONS FROM OTHERJURISDICTIONS Close-out Netting provision on the other hand is triggered upon termination of a As previously mentioned, prior to the contract following an event of default, before enactment of the Act, there was no legislative maturity of such contract. All obligations are framework for the enforcement of netting accelerated, and a calculation is made which arrangements under a financial derivative results in a single amount owed by one party transactions in Nigeria. Hence, legal advice as to the other party. to enforceability of netting arrangements have been based on contractual principles and Irrespective of the form that netting takes, in reliance on persuasive English authorities relation to financial derivative contracts, which have recognised the enforcement of netting, particularly the close-out netting is netting provisions in financial derivative used to hedge counterparty risks so the transactions. Due to the foregoing fact, payment and delivery obligations between the enforceability of netting arrangements in parties are accelerated, aggregated and their Nigeria were qualified and therefore subject to values determined. mandatory legislative insolvency provisions under the Repealed CAMA (as mentioned Set-off can be described as the offset of above and further discussed below. competing reciprocal debt obligations between the parties which is discharged to the extent of The enactment of the CAMA 2020 has however the other party’s monetary obligation. With ushered in a new legal regime for the set-off, one party’s liability will be reduced or recognition and enforcement of netting extinguished. Like netting, set-off comes in provisions in financial derivative contracts different forms: legal, equitable, insolvency, between parties. Preliminarily, to understand banker’s set-off and contractual set-off. the underlying policy behind the netting provisions in the Act, it is important to state Suffice to point out that the distinction, albeit that the netting provisions under the Act have technical, between “netting” and “set off” is been modelled, (with modifications to reflect that unlike netting which assesses parties’ local circumstances), in accordance with the mutual payment obligation, and involves the 2018 International Swaps and Derivative termination of obligations and replacement of Association (ISDA) Model Netting Act and same by a single payment obligation, thereby Policy Guide (the Model Act) which is the requiring payment of the net balance from only recognised international best metric for one party; with contractual set-off, there is a examining the sufficiency of a netting reciprocal monetary obligation between the legislation. 2 OCTOBER 2020 | NEWSLETTER The Scope of the Netting Provision under Central Bank of Nigeria; the Securities and CAMA2020 Exchange Commission; the National Insurance Commission; the National Pension The preliminary consideration in appraising the Commission; and any other financial regulatory netting provisions under the Act is determining authority established by an Act of the National the scope of the netting provision (i.e. the Assembly. transactions, activities and persons covered) 2 under the Act. By the provisions of the Act, The implication of the foregoing provisions is before the enforceability of obligations under a that the broad definition will accommodate not derivative contract can be determined, certain only other forms of financial derivatives requirements must be established, vis: (x) the contracts not listed in the Act, but also include transaction in question must be a qualified any other form of financial contract that may financial contract within the scope of the Act; be developed in the future. Thus, these (y) the collateral set off to be enforced upon provisions clearly recognises the dynamic the insolvency of a counterparty must by nature and continuing development in the consequence amount to netting, and by Nigerian financial market. This is unlike the agreement, qualify as a netting agreement restrictive approach applicable in other within the scope of the Act; and (z) the parties jurisdictions like Ireland where the Minister of must be within the category of persons Finance has the power to designate contracts covered under the provisions of the Act on the to be excluded from the scope of the netting 3 enforcement of netting provisions. legislation. These legal requirements have been Netting and Netting Agreement considered as follows: The second requirement under the Act is that Qualified Financial Contracts the agreement between the parties as evidenced by the QFC must be a netting The first legal requirement is that the agreement and the consequences of the transaction between the parties must be a activities required under the netting agreement qualified financial contract (QFC). In this wise, must amount to “netting”. The Act defines a section 718 of the Act defines a QFC in broad netting agreement as a “master netting terms to include practically all forms of agreement” or a "master-master netting financial derivative contracts including futures, agreement" between two or more parties that forwards, options, swaps, amongst others. To provides for netting of present or future further accommodate future expansion of the payment or delivery obligations or amounts list, section 719 provides that a financial arising under or in connection with one or regulatory authority, in relation to the relevant more QFCs. The definition also recognizes sector it regulates, has, the power to designate collateral arrangement made pursuant to such as QFC, any agreement, contract or netting agreements as QFCs. transaction, or type of agreement, contract or transaction, in addition to those listed in With respect to definition of “netting” the Act section 718 of the Act. In this wise, a financial describes “netting” as the occurrence of: regulatory authority is defined to include the 2. Section 718 of the Act. 3. See, Section 3(1) and (2) of the Irish Netting and Financial Contracts Act 1995. 3 OCTOBER 2020 | NEWSLETTER “(a) termination, liquidation or companies and pension fund acceleration of any payment or administrators, or any other body delivery obligation or entitlement corporate (including statutory under one or more QFCs entered into corporations or statutory bodies) under a netting agreement; (b) whether organised under the laws of calculation or estimation of a close-out Nigeria or under the laws of any other value, market value, liquidation value jurisdiction, and any international or or replacement value in respect of each regional development bank or other obligation or entitlement or group of international or regional organisation.” obligations or entitlements terminated, liquidated or accelerated under The implication of this provision is that there paragraph (a); (c) paragraph cannot be an excuse for non-enforcement of conversion of any values calculated or netting provisions on the grounds that either estimated under paragraph (b) into a of the parties is organised under any other single currency; and (d) determination laws other than the Nigerian law, as the of the net balance of the values definition captures foreign entities, calculated under paragraph (b), as supranational and international organisations. converted under paragraph (c), Enforceability of Netting Provisions vis-a- whether by operation of set-off or vis existing insolvency provisions: otherwise.” It is worthy to state that unlike the Model Act Having considered the scope of netting which counsels that netting provisions should provisions and persons covered under the Act, commence with issuance of notice, the netting it is also important to consider the preference provisions under the Act clearly does not accorded to the enforcement of the netting require issuance of notice prior to enforcement provisions vis-a -vis the insolvency provisions of netting provisions, meaning that the under the Act. Unlike what was obtainable occurrence of trigger events simpliciter, as under the Repealed CAMA, where the identified under the netting agreements insolvency provisions could override a netting suffices to activate netting without requirement arrangement, netting provisions have been for notice to the counterparty. accorded primacy over the insolvency provisions as further discussed below. Category of Persons Covered under the Primacy of the Netting Provisions over Provisions other Laws With respect to the categories of persons that To ensure the enforceability of netting may take advantage of netting provisions arrangements made under QFCs, the Act4 under the Act, the Act defines a party to mean: introduced a primacy provision which grants a person constituting one of the parties to a the Netting provisions, precedence over other netting agreement. Further, the Act proceeds acts, laws, regulations or directives including to define a person to include the following: any provision of law relating to bankruptcy, “partnerships, companies, regulated reorganisation, composition with creditors, entities such as banks, insurance 4. Under section 721(1) 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.