186x Filetype PPTX File size 0.14 MB Source: www.apec.org
Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee • Mission: facilitate regulatory cooperation among medical product regulatory authorities, build human capacity in regulatory science among medical product regulatory staff, and promote political will for convergence among regulatory policymakers in APEC • Est 2009 • Scope: Pharmaceutical Products & Medical Devices • Members: • Regulators from APEC Economies • Industry coalitions: – Research-based Pharmaceuticals – Medical Devices – Generic Pharmaceutical – Biotechnological Products – Advanced Therapies • CoE Coalition of Training Partners RHSC Guiding Principles • Mandate: To promote a more strategic, effective and sustainable approach to regulatory convergence • RHSC doesn’t produce harmonized guidances - promotes use & implementation of existing international standards, guidelines and best practices • Voluntary basis for engagement: ensures participation of those economies interested and committed to activities • Leverage work with other international harmonization initiatives to avoid duplication of work & most effective use of resources Regulatory Convergence Voluntary process whereby regulatory requirements across economies become more aligned over time as a result of the adoption of internationally recognized technical guidances, standards and best practices – It does not seek to establish new or change existing legal frameworks, laws, or regulations. It does not require regulators to be subject to any outside authority or prevent regulatory authorities from protecting and promoting public health. It does not have a specific endpoint; regulatory convergence is never “complete” or “achieved” as new products are developed, new standards are established, and new regulatory staff begin careers. • Regulatory reliance: a regulatory authority in one jurisdiction may take into account and give significant weight to – i.e., totally or partially rely upon – evaluations performed by another regulatory authority or trusted institution in reaching its own decision. The relying authority remains responsible and accountable for decisions taken, even when it relies on the decisions and information of others. Priority Work Areas (PWAs) • Multi Regional Clinical Trials and Good Clinical Practices Inspections (Japan and Thailand) • Pharmacovigilance (Korea) • Biotherapeutic Products (Current PWA Management: US and BIO) • Advanced Therapy Products (Singapore and US) • Good Registration Management (Chinese Taipei and Japan) • Global Supply Chain Integrity (US) • Medical Devices (Japan, Korea and US) Centers of Excellence (CoEs) • The Vision – A sustainable platform for promoting regulatory convergence, capacity and cooperation in areas of medical products – Science and best practice focus • The Approach – Partnership among training institutions/organizations, regulators and industry, to deliver and maintain educational programs – CoE Host Institutions collaborate with PWA Champions, PWA Steering Committee and CoE Coalition • Follow defined principles in CoE Operating Model • Ensure quality & consistent training programs via PWA Roadmap, Core Curriculum, Training Objectives, Performance Indicators & periodic assessments
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.