142x Filetype PPTX File size 1.36 MB Source: sefhouston.org
QUANTITATIVE VS. QUALITATIVE THINKING ABOUT QUESTIONS How? Why, What? Does, Is, Can, Should? COMPARING APPROACHES Quantitative Mixed Methods Qualitative Tests hypothesis that Uses the strengths of Responsive to is constructed prior to one method to changes that occur data collection overcome the during the study; weaknesses of another may shift focus Can generalize Can generate and test Can explain how findings when data are a grounded theory and why based on random phenomena occur samples of a sufficient in the participants’ size own words Pre-determined Both Emerging methods methods Instrument-based Both Open-ended questions questions COMPARING APPROACHES Quantitative Research Qualitative Research Statistical Analysis and Text and image analysis, theme interpretation and pattern interpretation Focuses on a relatively small Attempts to understand the number of concepts phenomenon in its entirety, rather (concise and narrow) than focusing on specific concepts (complex and broad) Begins with preconceived ideas Has few preconceived ideas and about how the concepts are stresses the importance of interrelated people’s interpretations of events and circumstances, rather than the researcher’s interpretation COMPARING APPROACHES Quantitative Research Qualitative Research Collects information under Does not attempt to control the conditions of control context of the research, but rather attempts to capture that context in its entirety Emphasizes objectivity in the Assumes that subjectivity is collection and analysis of essential for the understanding of information human experience Analyses numeric information Analyses narrative information in through statistical procedures an organized but intuitive fashion Investigator does not participate Involves sustained interaction in the events under investigation with the people being studied in – is most likely to collect data their own language and on their from a real distance own turf
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.