jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Outline For Powerpoint Presentation Example 75496 | Common Statistical Errors


 138x       Filetype PPTX       File size 0.19 MB       Source: cgf.cochrane.org


File: Outline For Powerpoint Presentation Example 75496 | Common Statistical Errors
outline mdsg templates protocol stage literature review structure of comparisons outcomes risk of bias heterogeneity subgroup sensitivity analyses review update stage exclusions description unit of analysis risk of bias justification ...

icon picture PPTX Filetype Power Point PPTX | Posted on 02 Sep 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
  Outline
  • MDSG templates
  • Protocol stage
    − Literature review, Structure of comparisons, 
     Outcomes, Risk of Bias, Heterogeneity, Subgroup & 
     Sensitivity analyses
  • Review/Update stage
    − Exclusions, Description, Unit of Analysis, Risk of 
     Bias justification, Departures from protocol, When to 
     pool, Interpretation
   Good News!
   • Structure and recognition
     − Primary outcomes, Adverse events, RCT designs, 
       Randomisation & Risk of Bias, Summary statistics & 
       Analysis, Confidence
   • MDSG templates
     − Methods & Results
     − Much improved standard and standardisation
   Templates
   • Please use them or cover same issues
      − Understand them first
      − Copy only relevant parts
      − Do what you copied!
  Systematic review
  • Explicit
  • Unambiguous
  • Repeatable
  • Formulaic, BUT...
  • ...source trials far from ideal
    − Require interpretation
    − Need methodological & clinical insight
  PROTOCOL STAGE
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Outline mdsg templates protocol stage literature review structure of comparisons outcomes risk bias heterogeneity subgroup sensitivity analyses update exclusions description unit analysis justification departures from when to pool interpretation good news and recognition primary adverse events rct designs randomisation summary statistics confidence methods results much improved standard standardisation please use them or cover same issues understand first copy only relevant parts do what you copied systematic explicit unambiguous repeatable formulaic but source trials far ideal require need methodological clinical insight...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.