180x Filetype PPTX File size 1.84 MB Source: www.erisee.org
2015 Research • Teacher Survey • Interviews with Stakeholders • Literature Review Albania Bosnia Herzegovina Kosovo* Macedonia (FYROM) Montenegro Serbia Turkey 2 GOVERNANCE It is essential that: 1. Effective and competent public authority that addresses strategy and drives implementation of professional development 2. Governance is open to contribution of stakeholders and social partners However, for VET in this region the research found: • Consultation but not sustained, no multi-stakeholder platforms on CPD • Moves towards decentralisation have not yet led to practical improvements in CPD • Legal norms exist – but do not distinguish between VET and general teachers QUALITY ASSURANCE OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT • National accreditation of CPD programmes exists in 6 countries but, according to some users, is a costly barrier or delay for potential training providers and does not guarantee high quality • Little quality assurance of CPD at school level – teachers are ‘consumers’ not shapers of CPD • Qualifications function as initial requirement to become teacher – but not much used to incentivise and quality assure CPD, e.g. modular post-graduate qualifications WHO PROVIDES CPD FOR VET TEACHERS? Commissioning model – encourages competition but does not adequately incentivise independent providers CPD dependent on donor-funded programmes – project driven and fragemented but may be possible to shape into more coherent and sustainable provision Universities and businesses make only modest contribution to CPD for VET teachers (outside of Turkey) Low level of specialist CPD provision for VET teachers PARTICIPATION IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.