139x Filetype PDF File size 0.39 MB Source: www.econstor.eu
Ali, Asghar Working Paper A conceptual framework for environmental justice based on shared but differentiated responsibilities CSERGE Working Paper EDM, No. 01-02 Provided in Cooperation with: The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University of East Anglia Suggested Citation: Ali, Asghar (2001) : A conceptual framework for environmental justice based on shared but differentiated responsibilities, CSERGE Working Paper EDM, No. 01-02, University of East Anglia, The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), Norwich This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/80259 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE BASED ON SHARED BUT DIFFERENTIATED RESPONSIBILITIES by Asghar Ali CSERGE Working Paper EDM 01-02 A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE BASED ON SHARED BUT DIFFERENTIATED RESPONSIBILITIES by Asghar Ali School of Environmental Sciences and The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk UK telephone: (44)(0)1603 592542: email - Asghar.Ali@uea.ac.uk Acknowledgements The support of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is gratefully acknowledged. This work was part of the interdisciplinary research programme of the ESRC Research Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE). The author wishes to thank Tim O'Riordan for his support and comments on an earlier version of this paper. ISSN 0967-8875 Abstract Environmental justice has become a major issue in the discourses of environment. The calls for environmental equity and justice are now part of major environmental negotiations like the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol, to give some examples. In this paper I locate the issues of environmental justice within the broader framework of environmental sustainability and the contemporary debates about theories of justice. The environmental justice movement in the USA, which has gained popular momentum in recent years, is briefly studied. This particular grassroots movement appears to be redefining the sustainability agenda with a strong social justice content. It has similarities with environmentally informed social justice movements in the developing world, the so- called ‘environmentalism of the poor’. Employing a critical discursive methodology I briefly and critically review some of the well-known theories of justice based on different principles of justice like need, desert and entitlement. These are looked at within the contemporary debates of universalism versus particularism or the ‘abstract’ liberal versus communitarian theories and some other critical perspectives on justice. I argue for a broader conception of environmental justice that takes into account particularities but is also sensitive to the global nature of many of the environmental problems that are spread and have impacts across regions, territories and even countries. In such situations it becomes necessary as a matter of justice to take into account differentiated impacts arising out of disproportionate contributions to environmental harms or ‘bads’. I further argue that a theory of justice, which will recognize this fact, will also have to consider differentiated responsibilities. Key words: Sustainability, sustainable development, equity, justice, distributive justice, vulnerabilities, responsibility.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.