Filetype Excel XLSX | Posted on 15 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Authentication
digital resources
173x Filetype XLSX File size 0.04 MB Source: iati.fcdo.gov.uk
Sheet 1: SSN4A PROJECT LOGFRAME
| GOAL of Scaling Sustainable Nutrition for All (Scaling SN4A) | ||||||
| Evidence of improved nutrition outcomes from scaled-up Sustainable Nutrition for All (SN4A) Approach and contribution to nutrition goals of the MCDP II | ||||||
| PROJECT TITLE | Scaling Sustainable Nutrition for All (Scaling SN4A) | |||||
| IMPACT: | Impact Indicator 1 | BASELINE | TARGET | ACHIEVED | SOURCE | |
| Improved dietary diversity of women of reproductive age (WRA 15-49 years) including adolescents (a diet diversity score of 5 or more); and minimum acceptable diet (MAD) of infants (6-23 months) (a diet diversity score of 4 or more) in 3 districts. | % increase in MDD-W (WRA) and % increase in MAD of infants 6-23 months NOTE: Anthropometrics (including LAZ) will be measured at the however it is not expected that there will be a reduction in chronic malnutrition after 2 years. Alignment has also been made with the USAID L&E . | MDD-W | 38.70% | 43.20% | Baseline and end of programme survey | |
| MAD | 28.20% | 35.20% | Baseline and end of programme survey | |||
| LAZ | 36.10% | 34.6% | ||||
| OUTCOME | Outcome Indicator 1 | |||||
| Outcome 1: Improved capacity of DNCCs, WNCCs, hub NCCs and local leaders to trigger and maintain demand for intra-household dietary and hygiene practices at scale | Measure of increased capacity to trigger demand using the 5 capability model among local leaders and service providers | capacity of DNCCs, WNCCs, hub NCCs and local leaders to trigger and maintain demand for intra-household dietary and hygiene practices at scale | TBD | All 3 DNCC's achieve at least 3 of the 5 capabilities by the end of 2021 | Baseline capability assessment | |
| Outcome Indicator 2 | ||||||
| Outcome 2: Effective behaviour change communication tailored to all groups is anchored in local practice, supported by social structures and results in improved dietary and hygiene practices | Number and percentage of men and women who report improved knowledge, attitudes and practices in dietary and hygiene behaviours. Measure of efficacy and understanding of the SBCC (incl. ENA, EHA) | Baseline and end of programme survey | ||||
| Proportion of Households with Handwashing Facility | 12.50% | 80.00% | ||||
| % children 6-23 months consuming diversified diets - | 25% | 50% | Baseline and end of programme survey | |||
| Knowledge that stunting is caused by poor dietary diversity | 58% | 80% | Baseline and end of programme survey | |||
| % of children 6-23 months consuming at least 4 food groups | 44% | 60% | ||||
| Proportion of respondents who know at least 3 of the 6 five critical times for handwashing | 25% | 80% | ||||
| % households with imporoved sanitation facilities | 32% | 50% | ||||
| Knowledge that poor WASH causes stunting | 5% | 80% | Baseline and end of programme survey | |||
| Outcome Indicator 3.1 | ||||||
| Outcome 3: Appropriate and diversified nutritious products are available at scale and supported by locally available and locally managed inputs, extension services and market linkages | Outcome Indicator 3.1: Increase in number and type of nutritious foods being grown and produced at farm household level: agrobiodiversity score | agrobiodiversity score | 7.37 | 9 | Baseline and end of programme survey | |
| Outcome Indicator 3.2 | ||||||
| Outcome Indicator 3.3: Household access to nutritious products at household level disaggregated by month. Measure of year round HH food security (MAHFP) | 75.2%) of the households experienced at least one month of inadequate food provisions | 50% of the households experienced at least one month of inadequate food provisions | All year crop availability assessment | |||
| Outcome Indicator 4.1 | ||||||
| Outcome 4: Strengthened governance capacity to implement NSA and IHH dietary and hygiene practices within multi-sectoral frameworks at scale | Outcome Indicator 4.1: Increase in planning and capacity for nutrition (e.g. nutrition action plans) at district level | No capacity | A DNCC established in each of the 3 districts | Project reports and Baseline and end of programme survey | ||
| i) do districts make plans/planning; ii) | No | Yes -as evidenced by DNCC action plan | Project reports and Baseline and end of programme survey | |||
| ii) do districts implement what they plan | No | Yes -as evidenced by DNCC MARF and quarterly narrative report | Project reports and Baseline and end of programme survey | |||
| iii) do districts coordinate plans/planning level across sectors around nutrition; | No | Yes - as evidenced by convergence of activities | Project reports and Baseline and end of programme survey | |||
| iv) do they include integration of village action plans | No | Yes | Project reports and Baseline and end of programme survey | |||
| Outcome Indicator 4.2 | ||||||
| Assessment of number of districts action plans integrating nutrition | Outcome Indicator 4.2: Increase in nutrition action plans at district level | No nutrition plans in place | Multi-sectotral Nutrition Action Plan in place at district level for each of the 3 districts | Project reports and Baseline and end of programme survey | ||
| Outcome Indicator 5 | Project reports and Baseline and end of programme survey | |||||
| Outcome 5: Evidence generated on the scaling of SN4A model for improving nutrition | Evidence of approach adapted by MCDP II stakeholder(s) such as UNICEF) and/or number of relevant policies supporting SN4A recommendations | No evidence | SNV hosts a webinar/Seminar for MCDPII partners on Triggering | Project reports and Baseline and end of programme survey | ||
| Measure of efficacy of advocacy activities | ||||||
| GOAL of Scaling Sustainable Nutrition for All (Scaling SN4A) | ||||||||||||||||
| Evidence of improved nutrition outcomes from scaled-up Sustainable Nutrition for All (SN4A) Approach and contribution to nutrition goals of the MCDP II | ||||||||||||||||
| PROJECT TITLE | Scaling Sustainable Nutrition for All (Scaling SN4A) | |||||||||||||||
| IMPACT: | Impact Indicator 1 | BASELINE | TARGET | 2019 Q 3 | 2020 Q4 | 2020 Q1 | 2020 Q2 | 2020 Q3 | 2021 Q4 | 2021 Q1 | 2021 Q2 | ACHIEVED | ||||
| Oct-Dec | Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun | Jul-Sep | Oct-Dec | Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun | Jul-Sep | |||||||||
| Improved dietary diversity of women of reproductive age (WRA 15-49 years) including adolescents (a diet diversity score of 5 or more); and minimum acceptable diet (MAD) of infants (6-23 months) (a diet diversity score of 4 or more) in 3 districts. | % increase in MDD-W (WRA) and % increase in MAD of infants 6-23 months NOTE: Anthropometrics (including LAZ) will be measured at the however it is not expected that there will be a reduction in chronic malnutrition after 2 years. Alignment has also been made with the USAID L&E . | 38.7% | 36.70% | 37.00% | ||||||||||||
| OUTPUT 1 | Output Indicator 1.1 | |||||||||||||||
| Output 1.1: DNCCs, WNCCs, Hub NCCs and local leaders are trained and enabled to conduct triggering and maintain demand. | Output Indicator 1.1.1: Number of local leaders and district level service providers Triggered for demand generation | 0 | 1290 | 0 | 0 | 123 | 278 | 436 | 837 | |||||||
| Output Indicator 1.1.1: percentage of local leaders and district level service providers Triggered for demand generation | 0 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 31% | 65% | 65% | ||||||||
| Output Indicator 1.1.2: Number of local leaders and district level service providers active in triggering demand for intra-household dietary diversity and hygiene practices and providing follow up | 0 | 1290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 202 | 202 | 404 | ||||||||
| Output Indicator 1.1.2: Percentage of local leaders and district level service providers active in triggering demand for intra-household dietary diversity and hygiene practices and providing follow up | 0 | 20% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 17% | 31% | ||||||||
| Output Indicator 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Output 1.2: Communities in the 3 districts are triggered for improved IHH dietary and hygiene practice | Output 1.2.1: Number of villages in districts that are triggered for improved intra-household nutrition | 0 | 1290 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 284 | 436 | 727 | |||||||
| Output 1.2.1: Percentage of villages in districts that are triggered for improved intra-household nutrition | 0 | 90% | 0 | 0 | 56.4% | 22% | 33% | |||||||||
| The number of villages in districts outside SN4A triggered | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Output Indicator 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Output 1.2.2. Total number of people participated in triggering | 0 | 149940 | 0 | 0 | 754 | 90064 | 64837 | 155655 | ||||||||
| Output 1.2.2. % of people participated in triggering by gender | 0 | 90% | 0 | 0 | 103.8% | 60% | 42% | |||||||||
| number of males participated in triggering | 0 | 0 | 0 | 173 | 48001 | 28766 | 76940 | |||||||||
| number of females participated in triggering | 0 | 0 | 0 | 581 | 42063 | 36071 | 78715 | |||||||||
| Output Indicator 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Output 1.2: Communities in the 3 districts are triggered for improved IHH dietary and hygiene practice | Number of villages certified | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| percentage of villages certified | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| Output Indicator 2.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Output 2.2 Communities in the 3 districts participate in SN4A SBCC | Output 2.2.1 Number of men and women reporting to have been part of the improved nutrition and hygiene promotion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Output 2.2.1 Number of women reporting to have been part of the improved nutrition and hygiene promotion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Output Indicator 2.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Measure of efficacy of the gender sensitive approach in SBCC campaigns | Output 2.2.2 % of women who report having a greater say in intra-household decision making about nutritious food production and consumption | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||||||
| OUTPUT 3 | Output Indicator 3.1 | |||||||||||||||
| Output 3.1: Nutrition hubs are supported to facilitate market linkages and home production of ASFs and fruit/vegetables/beans (gardens) | Number of nutrition hubs supported with market linkages | 0 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Number of nutrition hubs with demonstration agriculture plots | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Output Indicator 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Output 3.2: Households and men and women farmers are generating income from crops to support household diversity | Output 3.2.1 Measure of how many HH spend income on nutritious food | TBD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Output Indicator 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Output 3.3: Households are producing diversified food | Output 3.3.1 Number of households with home gardens producing at least 1 legume, 1 orange/dark green vegetable and 1 small livestock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Measure of overall agricultural production capacity (plants, livestock etc.) | ||||||||||||||||
| Output Indicator 4.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Output 4.2: DNCC and WNCC plans in nutrition sensitive interventions are developed and implemented | Output 4.2.1 Number of districts with relevant district plans for nutrition | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | |||||||
| Use of SN4A activities and evidence in the district plans | ||||||||||||||||
| Output Indicator 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Output 4.3: Facilitate existing SN4A districts to provide TA and capacity strengthening in new districts | Output 4.3.1 Number of times Lunte/Mporokoso/Mungwi district teams involved in training of new Scaling SN4A districts | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||
| Output Indicator 5.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Output 5.2: Generate evidence on the scalability and effectiveness of SN4A model | Output 5.2.1 Contributions made to Provincial and District Plans and National standards | None | DNCC contribute to the MTEF process | nil | nil | nil | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| Measure of efficacy of advocacy | ||||||||||||||||
| Output Indicator 5.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Measure of project advocacy efforts | Output 5.2.2 Number of policy/technical briefs developed by SN4A | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.
