jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Leadership Pdf 165852 | Master Thesis Park Popescu


 128x       Filetype PDF       File size 1.41 MB       Source: www.projektakademien.se


File: Leadership Pdf 165852 | Master Thesis Park Popescu
e leadership for project managers virtual leadership and trust building for perceived project success master thesis within business administration authors alfred park luminita popescu tutor ethel brundin jonkoping may 2014 ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 24 Jan 2023 | 2 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
                
                
                                              
                    
                      E-leadership for project managers: 
                   virtual leadership and trust-building for perceived project 
                                                           success 
                                                               Master Thesis within Business Administration 
                                                               Authors:      Alfred Park & Luminita Popescu 
                                                               Tutor:        Ethel Brundin 
                                                               Jönköping     May 2014 
                                                                                              Master Thesis 2014 
                                                                                                  Park & Popescu 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                Acknowledgement 
                 
                With the following lines we would like to express our appreciation and gratitude to all the people 
                that contributed to this master thesis.  
                First, we want to particularly thank our advisor Prof. Ethel Brundin for her good advice, constant 
                insightful  feedback  and  patience  to  guide  us  through  our  struggles  in  achieving  a,  hopefully 
                successful end. Her valuable comments made a huge difference in the overall result.  
                Second, we owe great thanks to Mats Ragnarsson from Wenell Management AB. This thesis 
                would  not  have  been  possible  without  his  help  of  introducing  us  to  the  project  managers 
                participating in our study. He also spent his valuable time in giving us suggestions and useful 
                insights into the topic.  
                Also, we thank the project leaders that found themselves available for being interviewed and 
                enriched our research with their generous contribution. Additionally, we thank the project team 
                members for participation in the survey. 
                To our fellow students, thank you for your time, engagement and constructive feedback during 
                the seminars. We wish you all a thriving future ahead! 
                Last but not least, we deeply thank our families and friends who encouraged and supported us 
                throughout the entire time of our research project.   
                 
                Jönköping – May 12th, 2014 
                 
                 
                        Alfred Park                                                  Luminita Popescu                                   
                                                                                                   E-LEADERSHIP  
                 
                                                                                            Master Thesis 2014 
                                                                                                Park & Popescu 
                 
                 
                Master’s Thesis in  Business Administration 
                 
                Title:                E-Leadership for Project Managers – Virtual Leadership and trust-building 
                                      for perceived project success 
                Author:               Alfred Park & Luminita Popescu   
                Tutor:                Ethel Brundin 
                Date:                 2014 – 05 – 12 
                Subject terms:        Virtual  leadership,  Challenges,  Leadership  behaviour,  Task-oriented 
                                      leadership,  Relations-oriented  leadership,  Shared  leadership,  Trust-
                                      building, Project success, Project Management 
                Abstract 
                Background            Globalisation  has  brought  substantial  changes  to  the  global  economic 
                                      landscape  and  has  intensified  organisational  leadership  complexity. 
                                      Therefore,  the  rapid  global  expansion  and  the  fast-moving  technology 
                                      have  increased  virtual  collaborations  and  created  opportunities  for 
                                      organisations  worldwide.  Thus,  many  organisational  projects  are 
                                      characterized by a certain degree of virtuality which developed the need 
                                      for  alternative  leadership  in  a  virtual  context,  a  phenomenon  more 
                                      relevant as businesses move toward more non-traditional work. 
                Purpose               The purpose of this thesis is to explore the leadership of project managers 
                                      in  a  virtual  setting,  focusing  on  the  challenges  to  virtual  leadership,  on 
                                      trust building, and task- and relationship-oriented leadership behaviour for 
                                      perceived project success.  
                Method                Semi-structured interviews were used to assess leaders’ behaviour in virtual 
                                      projects, how trust was achieved and how the challenges specific to the 
                                      virtual  context  affected  perceived  project  success.  Questionnaires  were 
                                      used as part of the triangulation technique in order to add the perspective 
                                      of team members and increase the validity of results. Therefore, a mixed-
                                      methods design was employed. 
                Findings               The results of this study revealed that technology affects communication 
                                      through low synchronicity and social presence; cultural differences affect 
                                      how team members perceive project goal achievement, and task-related 
                                      conflicts  have  a  positive  impact  on  effectiveness.  Moreover,  trust  was 
                                      initially  achieved through creating a unifying purpose for the members, 
                                      whereas along the development of a project, the influence project leaders 
                                      had on trust was often limited to the temporary nature of projects. Also, 
                                      task-related leadership behaviour increases in importance at the beginning 
                                      and end of a project and the relationship behaviour more in the middle 
                                      stages. Shared leadership was perceived as beneficial for coordination of 
                                      tasks but it did not apply to decision-making. 
                Conclusion            E-leadership  encounters  challenges  that  increase  task-related  leadership 
                                      behaviours and render trust-building difficult  to  achieve.  However,  the 
                                      virtual  environment  creates  opportunities  that  project  managers  should 
                                      seek to foster and reduce the constraints of these challenges.                               
                                                                                                 E-LEADERSHIP  
                 
                                                     Master Thesis 2014 
                                                       Park & Popescu 
          
          
         Table of Contents 
         Introduction .......................................................................................................1 
           1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 2 
           1.2 Problem Statement ......................................................................................................................... 2 
           1.3 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 4 
           1.4 Disposition ........................................................................................................................................ 4 
         Frame of Reference........................................................................................... 5 
           2.1 Project management and virtual teams .................................................................................... 6 
            2.1.1 From traditional projects to virtual projects .......................................................................... 7 
            2.1.2 The challenges of working with virtual teams ....................................................................... 8 
            2.1.3 Trust-building in virtual teams ............................................................................................... 11 
           2.2 Virtual leadership .......................................................................................................................... 15 
            2.2.1 Defining E-Leadership ............................................................................................................ 15 
            2.2.2 Leadership behaviour in virtual teams .................................................................................. 15 
            2.2.3 Shared leadership ..................................................................................................................... 17 
         Methodology .................................................................................................... 19 
           3.1 Research philosophy .................................................................................................................... 20 
           3.2 Research approach ....................................................................................................................... 21 
           3.3 Methodological choice ................................................................................................................ 21 
            3.3.1   The nature of the research design ....................................................................................... 22 
           3.4 Research strategy.......................................................................................................................... 22 
           3.5 Time horizon ................................................................................................................................. 23 
           3.6 Data collection .............................................................................................................................. 23 
            3.6.1 Semi-structured interviews ..................................................................................................... 23 
            3.6.2 Questionnaire ........................................................................................................................... 25 
           3.7 Data analysis .................................................................................................................................. 26 
           3.8 Research ethics ............................................................................................................................. 27 
           3.9 Research limitations and reflections ....................................................................................... 28 
         Empirical Findings & Analysis ...................................................................... 30 
           4.1 Perceived project success ........................................................................................................... 31 
           4.2 The challenges of working with virtual teams ..................................................................... 32 
            4.2.1 Technology and Communication .......................................................................................... 32 
            4.2.2 Cultural differences .................................................................................................................. 33 
            4.2.3 Conflicts .................................................................................................................................... 34 
             
                                                        E-LEADERSHIP  
          
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...E leadership for project managers virtual and trust building perceived success master thesis within business administration authors alfred park luminita popescu tutor ethel brundin jonkoping may acknowledgement with the following lines we would like to express our appreciation gratitude all people that contributed this first want particularly thank advisor prof her good advice constant insightful feedback patience guide us through struggles in achieving a hopefully successful end valuable comments made huge difference overall result second owe great thanks mats ragnarsson from wenell management ab not have been possible without his help of introducing participating study he also spent time giving suggestions useful insights into topic leaders found themselves available being interviewed enriched research their generous contribution additionally team members participation survey fellow students you your engagement constructive during seminars wish thriving future ahead last but least de...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.