128x Filetype PDF File size 1.41 MB Source: www.projektakademien.se
E-leadership for project managers: virtual leadership and trust-building for perceived project success Master Thesis within Business Administration Authors: Alfred Park & Luminita Popescu Tutor: Ethel Brundin Jönköping May 2014 Master Thesis 2014 Park & Popescu Acknowledgement With the following lines we would like to express our appreciation and gratitude to all the people that contributed to this master thesis. First, we want to particularly thank our advisor Prof. Ethel Brundin for her good advice, constant insightful feedback and patience to guide us through our struggles in achieving a, hopefully successful end. Her valuable comments made a huge difference in the overall result. Second, we owe great thanks to Mats Ragnarsson from Wenell Management AB. This thesis would not have been possible without his help of introducing us to the project managers participating in our study. He also spent his valuable time in giving us suggestions and useful insights into the topic. Also, we thank the project leaders that found themselves available for being interviewed and enriched our research with their generous contribution. Additionally, we thank the project team members for participation in the survey. To our fellow students, thank you for your time, engagement and constructive feedback during the seminars. We wish you all a thriving future ahead! Last but not least, we deeply thank our families and friends who encouraged and supported us throughout the entire time of our research project. Jönköping – May 12th, 2014 Alfred Park Luminita Popescu E-LEADERSHIP Master Thesis 2014 Park & Popescu Master’s Thesis in Business Administration Title: E-Leadership for Project Managers – Virtual Leadership and trust-building for perceived project success Author: Alfred Park & Luminita Popescu Tutor: Ethel Brundin Date: 2014 – 05 – 12 Subject terms: Virtual leadership, Challenges, Leadership behaviour, Task-oriented leadership, Relations-oriented leadership, Shared leadership, Trust- building, Project success, Project Management Abstract Background Globalisation has brought substantial changes to the global economic landscape and has intensified organisational leadership complexity. Therefore, the rapid global expansion and the fast-moving technology have increased virtual collaborations and created opportunities for organisations worldwide. Thus, many organisational projects are characterized by a certain degree of virtuality which developed the need for alternative leadership in a virtual context, a phenomenon more relevant as businesses move toward more non-traditional work. Purpose The purpose of this thesis is to explore the leadership of project managers in a virtual setting, focusing on the challenges to virtual leadership, on trust building, and task- and relationship-oriented leadership behaviour for perceived project success. Method Semi-structured interviews were used to assess leaders’ behaviour in virtual projects, how trust was achieved and how the challenges specific to the virtual context affected perceived project success. Questionnaires were used as part of the triangulation technique in order to add the perspective of team members and increase the validity of results. Therefore, a mixed- methods design was employed. Findings The results of this study revealed that technology affects communication through low synchronicity and social presence; cultural differences affect how team members perceive project goal achievement, and task-related conflicts have a positive impact on effectiveness. Moreover, trust was initially achieved through creating a unifying purpose for the members, whereas along the development of a project, the influence project leaders had on trust was often limited to the temporary nature of projects. Also, task-related leadership behaviour increases in importance at the beginning and end of a project and the relationship behaviour more in the middle stages. Shared leadership was perceived as beneficial for coordination of tasks but it did not apply to decision-making. Conclusion E-leadership encounters challenges that increase task-related leadership behaviours and render trust-building difficult to achieve. However, the virtual environment creates opportunities that project managers should seek to foster and reduce the constraints of these challenges. E-LEADERSHIP Master Thesis 2014 Park & Popescu Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Problem Statement ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Disposition ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Frame of Reference........................................................................................... 5 2.1 Project management and virtual teams .................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 From traditional projects to virtual projects .......................................................................... 7 2.1.2 The challenges of working with virtual teams ....................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Trust-building in virtual teams ............................................................................................... 11 2.2 Virtual leadership .......................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.1 Defining E-Leadership ............................................................................................................ 15 2.2.2 Leadership behaviour in virtual teams .................................................................................. 15 2.2.3 Shared leadership ..................................................................................................................... 17 Methodology .................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Research philosophy .................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Research approach ....................................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Methodological choice ................................................................................................................ 21 3.3.1 The nature of the research design ....................................................................................... 22 3.4 Research strategy.......................................................................................................................... 22 3.5 Time horizon ................................................................................................................................. 23 3.6 Data collection .............................................................................................................................. 23 3.6.1 Semi-structured interviews ..................................................................................................... 23 3.6.2 Questionnaire ........................................................................................................................... 25 3.7 Data analysis .................................................................................................................................. 26 3.8 Research ethics ............................................................................................................................. 27 3.9 Research limitations and reflections ....................................................................................... 28 Empirical Findings & Analysis ...................................................................... 30 4.1 Perceived project success ........................................................................................................... 31 4.2 The challenges of working with virtual teams ..................................................................... 32 4.2.1 Technology and Communication .......................................................................................... 32 4.2.2 Cultural differences .................................................................................................................. 33 4.2.3 Conflicts .................................................................................................................................... 34 E-LEADERSHIP
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.