105x Filetype PDF File size 0.92 MB Source: enrd.ec.europa.eu
The impact of LEADER on balanced territorial development, 2014-2020 Janet Dwyer and Katarina Kubinakova, ccri@glos.ac.uk 10th meeting, Sub-group on LEADER and Community-Led Local Development February 2022 1 Evaluation Methodology All online - Covid 14 Evaluation Study Questions on the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and EU value-added of LEADER Document and literature review, Case studies EU-level data and indicator analysis • 36 LAGs, from 14 RDPs in 10 contrasting Member States Online Surveys 285 Interviews: • Managing Authorities (56, in 27 MS- • LEADER personnel + beneficiaries no response from Finland) • local + regional stakeholders • LAGs (511 complete, in all 28 MS- • EU experts about 800 replied in total) • Validation workshops at draft report stage, in each Case Study Data analysis • Comparing MA & LAG surveys • Comparing Case Studies with survey between MS, factors and outcomes Validation webinar with EC 2 Case study LAGs Materials collected: Interviews • LAG managers • MA (& PA if needed) • 3-5 Beneficiaries per LAG • LAG member / other stakeholder, per case DATA / factual information • RDP documents • Standard indicators • Evaluations (& self- evaluations) • Scientific studies 3 LEADER -extent LAG budgetary spending to 2020 and 2021, EC data LAG coverage of rural population (Source: AIRs 2020) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% AT BE BG CY CZ DEDK EE ES FI FR GRHRHU IE IT LT LU LV MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK UK EUR 7.01 Billion planned, 2014-2020 (7% EAFRD) 2,784 LEADER LAGs in the EU-28 Uptake accelerated (ave 49%, by Sept ‘21) Cover a significant share of EU rural population – Expenditure Sept 2021 includes transition (2014-22), set more than half, in 23 countries against 2020 budget Mostly 2019 data (AIRs 2020), some 2018 (AIRs 2019) 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.