157x Filetype PDF File size 0.54 MB Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Pedagogy, curriculum, teaching practices and teacher education in developing countries EVIDENCE BRIEF The evidence suggests that when teachers see pedagogy as entailing communication with students they use practices in interactive ways that mean that learning is more likely to take place: the ‘how’ is more important than ‘what’ teachers do. About this brief drawing on students’ alignment of professional This paper summaries evidence backgrounds and experiences. development with teachers’ from a DFID-funded review by Six practices used in interactive needs, the promoted pedagogy Westbrook et al. (2013), entitled ways by effective teachers were and in-class monitoring of Pedagogy, Curriculum, Teaching more likely to enhance learning: teachers Practices and Teacher Education demonstration and explanation, support from head teachers in Developing Countries, produced drawing on subject knowledge alignment of forms of by the University of Sussex. The flexible use of whole-class, group assessment with the school review identifies pedagogic and pair work where students curriculum. practices that most effectively discuss a shared task Practices were disabled by support all students to learn, and frequent, relevant use of learning misalignment of: determines ways that these can be materials beyond the textbook initial teacher training with the supported by teacher education open and closed questioning, school curriculum and the school curriculum. expanding responses, Continuing professional encouraging questioning development with the promoted This brief provides an overview of use of local languages and code pedagogy the strength of evidence, key switching (switching between two the school curriculum with findings and theory of change, to languages within a sentence to assessment. assist policy makers and ensure understanding) Further disabling factors were: researchers in assessing the planning and varying lesson poor communication with the evidence in this field. It is not sequences. community and policy makers designed to compare specific limited resources and large class intervention packages. Practices used were student- sizes. centred and teacher-led, but Key findings informed by social constructivist Evidence Base Pedagogic practices were most approaches that see knowledge as effective when they involved socially constructed and learning The overall strength of the communication with students. as a social process. A positive and evidence is moderate. However, Three strategies indicated where mutually reinforcing relationship the evidence is less robust on the teachers were focused on between teacher attitudes, impact of practices on student students’ learning: strategies and practices was learning outcomes, with few found. studies using baseline and post- feedback, paying inclusive and test measurements. sustained attention to students Practices were enabled by: creating a safe classroom teacher peer support environment DFID RESEARCH AND EVIDENCE DIVISION: EVIDENCE BRIEF 1 Teacher education: ITE, CPD Theory of change Training aligned to curriculum & specific pedagogy, & tailored to teachers’ existing knowledge, practices & Curriculum contexts moderate evidence • Pitch at a level appropriate to students & Teacher manuals & scripted lesson plans moderate make content accessible and relevant to evidence students weak evidence Teacher educators understand and use promoted pedagogy weak evidence • CPD courses to cover new subjects & Regular follow-up support in classrooms moderate working with students with special needs evidence weak evidence Facilitate teacher peer support moderate evidence • Align assessment modes with curricular pedagogic design moderate evidence ASSU - support from school head & ASSU community - - Sufficient flexibility in M - realistic expectations of teachers’ national or school M ALIGNMENT PTI progress curriculum PTI O - O NS - Buy-in from NS teachers This diagram represents a proposal for the optimal - Recognition in Teacher thinking alignments between pedagogy, teacher education curriculum and teacher - - Acceptance by Positive attitudes towards training & students weak evidence education that support stakeholders maximum change in teachers’ Communicative strategies practices and which are more likely to lead to increases in Responsive feedback, sustained and inclusive approach student learning attainment. It moderate evidence also addresses the assumptions Draw on students’ backgrounds and experiences in teaching inherent in making that change weak evidence happen at each step. Concern to create a ‘safe’ environment in classroom Strength of the evidence moderate evidence Teaching practices Moderate - Slightly more robust evidence was found on the Explanations informed by pedagogical content knowledge weak importance of teachers paying evidence attention to students, use of Varied use of whole-class, group and pair work moderate group work, interactive evidence questioning and use of materials. Use of variety of learning materials moderate evidence The evidence within teacher Interactive questioning style moderate evidence education is moderate on: Use of local languages and/or code switching moderate alignment of training with evidence pedagogy; provision of teacher Lesson planning that incorporates variety moderate evidence manuals; in-class support and practice; and peer support. A Weak - the evidence is weakest SS on how the practices impact on - Students able U student attainment and to learn from MP stakeholder satisfaction. these practices T I O Within the curriculum, evidence - Sufficient NS is weak apart from alignment of learning assessment with curriculum materials design. Impact on students Greater student attendance, engagement moderate evidence Higher student attainment weak evidence Stakeholder satisfaction weak evidence DFID RESEARCH AND EVIDENCE DIVISION: EVIDENCE BRIEF 2 Outcomes by type and quality of study Forty five studies that were quality assessed as either High or Moderate were included in the final narrative synthesis. The studies were classified into three types: interventions, reforms and existing conditions. Intervention: Studies or evaluations of pedagogic practices within the context of a specific project or attempt to improve schooling in a particular location through means such as funding, training and providing material resources. Reform: studies that take place in the context of large-scale reform mostly of national curricula, and therefore, as in interventions, there is likely to be an indication of the desired practices to be produced by the reform. Existing conditions: exploratory research which describes and analyses what is going on in a location. Interventions or reforms may have played a part but are not highlighted by the study. Reform studies by quality Intervention studies by quality 12 12 10 10 iesd 8 dies 8 sut stu of 6 of 6 r Mixed er Positive eb b mu 4 Negative um 4 Mixed N N 2 2 0 0 High High/Mod. Moderate High High/Mod. Moderate Quality of study Quality of study Existing conditions studies by quality Studies were categorised as to whether they reported mostly positive outcomes, mixed results or mostly 12 negative outcomes. The vast majority of studies were qualitative, with only four quantitative. They came from 10 20 different countries, predominantly from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Students in the majority of studies ies 8 came from poor or marginalised backgrounds and dtu included girls. sf Positive The evidence consists of studies where a variety of or 6 pedagogical practices were used, and in different eb Mixed combinations, indicating how varied their implementation mu 4 N Negative may be. Results indicated that the outcome is dependent 2 on implementation. When viewed in the light of the strategies and teacher 0 attitudes that shape how practices are implemented, it is High High/Mod. Moderate possible to identify some of the factors shaping the Quality of studies outcomes of teaching and learning. How teachers implement a particular practice is more important than what pedagogic approach they use. Research gaps Larger-scale mixed-methods studies with baseline and post-tests measuring student attainment associated with specific practices over time and inclusion of students’ perspectives. Effective practices for students with disabilities and overage students, and in multigrade classes. Further observational evidence of effective practices for very large classes. Examples of curricula designed for specific student groups; teachers’ use of assessment in relation to the curriculum. DFID RESEARCH AND EVIDENCE DIVISION: EVIDENCE BRIEF 3 What is the evidence on the effectiveness of pedagogical practices, in what conditions, and with what population of learners? This table presents the evidence for effective practices under the three pedagogic aspects of attitudes, strategies and practices and expands the headlines given in the Theory of Change on page 3. Teachers used combinations of these practices in observed lessons, but even used in isolation they sometimes led to improvements, although there is also evidence that the same practice can result in poor outcomes (often where practices are delivered without consideration of the students). The first number in the bracket represents the numbers of studies for each aspect. The second is the number of those that gave evidence of increases in student attainment as a result of the practice. The strength of the evidence for each aspect is given in the right hand column. The evidence overall is moderate but inconsistent, with both positive and negative findings identified in different countries and regions and in different types of study. Positive examples Negative examples Overall Pedagogic aspect (Number of studies/number of studies (number of studies) strength of giving evidence of increases in student evidence attainment) Training & Harmonisation between culture, Constructions of the teacher as Pedagogy training, pedagogy and classroom authoritarian prevent understanding Weak es contexts makes teachers positive of interactive practices (8) tud towards new practices (4/2) tti Positive attitudes towards poor and A Students marginalised students leads to Moderate awareness of students’ backgrounds, experiences and abilities (6/1) Tailoring instruction to specific Paying students, giving tests, homework, Groups of students ignored, attention constructive feedback, including all especially students with disabilities in Moderate students in lesson content and large classrooms (6) es discourse (7/4) gi Students’ backgrounds, prior ate Student knowledge and local examples drawn Lesson content overly abstract & Weak trS characteristics upon to make lesson content relevant irrelevant for students (2) and meaningful (5/1) Lively, warm and friendly teachers Classroom encourage participation. Absence of Moderate Environment corporal punishment makes students feel safe (6/2) Verbal interaction in small mixed and Permanent rows, little peer Group work ability groups, sharing tasks and interaction; active zone of students at Moderate resources, monitored by the teacher front do best (5) (15/4) Variety of materials used with Learning textbook, from mp3s to stones, Prescriptive and sole use of difficult Moderate materials integrated with prior knowledge & textbooks, copying from board (7) concept formation (9/5) esc Use of Open and closed, expanding and Frequent closed questions, choral ti questions probing responses, encouraging responses, one word answers (7) Moderate acr student questioning (10/4) P Imaginative, interactive demonstrations Demonstration & explanations using voice, students, Didactic lecturing, poor content Weak images, based on sound content and knowledge (13) pedagogical content knowledge (8/1) Use of local language gives access to Unfamiliar language led to rote Language lesson content and encourages verbal learning & incomprehension (3) Moderate interaction (9/3) Lesson Planned lessons led to varied Predictable teaching sequence Moderate structure sequences of methods & tasks (11/3) limited variety of activities (15) DFID RESEARCH AND EVIDENCE DIVISION: EVIDENCE BRIEF 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.