167x Filetype PDF File size 0.77 MB Source: zenodo.org
International Journal of E-ISSN : 2454-8006 Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering (ijasre) DOI: 10.31695/IJASRE.2020.33766 Volume 6, Issue 3 March - 2020 Review of Literature on Teaching and Learning Geometry and Measurement: A Case of Ghanaian Standards Based Mathematics Curriculum 1 1 1 2 Samuel Baah-Duodu Vivian Osei-Buabeng , Ennin Francis Cornelius , John Ekow Hegan and , 3 Prof. M.J Nabie 1Department of Mathematics/ICT, Agogo Presbyterian Women‟s College of Education Agogo, A/A Ghana 2Department of Mathematics/ICT Methodist College of Education Akyem Oda, Ghana 3Department of Mathematics Education, University of Education Winneba, Ghana _______________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT This study aimed at providing a theoretical background for the development of the Geometry and Measurement Strands in the New Ghanaian Standards-Based Curriculum. As such it should be of aid to inform the supervisory committee of the Ghana Education Service, National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NaCCA), National Teacher Education Curriculum Framework (NTECF) and Ministry of Education, considering the Mathematics section of the current Ghana Curriculum Review project. This report concentrated on progressions in the two strands both within the area of higher-level thinking (what we will refer to as ‘pedagogy’) and within the area of content (‘knowledge’). While much has been written on the theoretical progressions, concerns showed that there is little to be found on progressions that could be of direct assistance to the facilitator (classroom teacher). The main emphasis of the theoretical writing on progressions in geometry tends to be on the increasing sophistication of overall ‘understanding’ of geometry (how do learners do geometry?); in contrast to the curriculum descriptions of geometry, it tends to focus much more on the content of knowledge/ability (what do learners do in geometry?). Findings also revealed that the ‘Count Me into Measurement program’ is the Learning Framework in Measurement, which aims to describe the stages learners progress through in developing an understanding of measurement. The Learning Framework describes three key stages: Identification of the attribute (direct comparison/partitioning/conservation); Informal measurement (counting units/relating number of units to quantity/comparison of measurements); and Unit structure (replicating a single unit/relating size of units to the number required). Learners are perceived as passing through the same three stages in their understanding of each of length, area, volume/capacity and mass, though not at the same time, as increasing the number of dimensions measured leads to the increasing complexity of the concept. Key Words: Standards Based, Curriculum, Measurement, Geometry. _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. INTRODUCTION In the year 2019, the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NaCCA) in collaboration with the Ministry of Education rolled out the new standards-based curriculum for Ghanaian basic schools, which is a demonstration of placing learning at the heart of every classroom and ensuring that every learner receives quality education [1]. Provision of accessible quality education for all is non-negotiable if we are to meet the human capital needs of our country, required for accelerated sustainable national development. It is for this reason that the new curriculum sets out clearly the learning areas that need to be taught, how they should be taught and how they should be assessed. It provides a set of core competencies and standards that learners are to know, understand and demonstrate as they progress through the curriculum from one content standard to the other and from one phase to the next. The curriculum and its related teachers‟ manual promote the use of inclusive and gender responsive pedagogy within the context of learning-centred teaching methods so that every learner can participate in every learning process and enjoy learning. The curriculum encourages the www.ijasre.net Page 103 Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering (ijasre), Vol 6 (3), March -2020 use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for teaching and learning – ICTs as teaching and learning materials. The new curriculum has at its heart the acquisition of skills in the 4Rs of Reading, wRiting, aRithmetic and cReativity by all learners. It is expected that at any point of exit from a formal education, all learners should be equipped with these foundational skills for life, which are also prerequisites for Ghana becoming a learning nation. The graduates from the school system should become functional citizens in the 4Rs and lifelong learners. They should be digital literates, critical thinkers and problem solvers. The education they receive through the study of the learning areas in the curriculum should enable them to collaborate and communicate well with others and be innovative. The graduates from Ghana‟s schools should be leaders with a high sense of national and global identity. The curriculum therefore provides a good opportunity in its design to develop individuals with the right skills and attitudes to lead the transformation of Ghana into an industrialised learning nation. For this reason, the Ministry of Education expects that learners, as a result of the new knowledge, skills and values they have acquired through the new curriculum, will show a new sense of identity as creative, honest and responsible citizens. These are the core values that underpin the identification and selection of the learning areas for this curriculum. These core values serve as fundamental building blocks for developing into learners the spirit of teamwork, respect, resilience and the commitment to achieving excellence. The Ministry endorses a quality learning experience as an entitlement for each of Ghana‟s school-going girl and boy; the curriculum has rightly focused on learning and learning progression. The Ministry has also endorsed accountability as a critical domain for effective workings of standards-based curriculum. More importantly the role of the teacher is to make this curriculum work for the intended purpose - to inculcate in learners the core competencies and values and to make learning happen; improve learning outcomes – and the support that teachers need is duly recognised and endorsed. The Ministry of Education supports and continue to support the implementation of the curriculum to include capacity development of all teachers in the new curriculum because teachers matter in the development and delivery of the standards- based curriculum. Mathematics forms an integral part of our everyday lives. It is a universal truth that development is hinged on Mathematics. It is the backbone of social, economic, political and physical development of a country. It is a never-ending creative process which serves to promote discovery and understanding. It consists of a body of knowledge which attempts to explain and interpret phenomena and experiences. Mathematics has changed our lives, and is vital to Ghana‟s future development. To provide quality Mathematics education, teachers must facilitate learning in the Mathematics classroom. This will provide the foundations for discovering and understanding the world around us and lay the grounds for Mathematics and Mathematics related studies at higher levels of education. Learners should be encouraged to understand how Mathematics can be used to explain what is occurring, predict how things will behave and analyse causes and origins of things in our environment. The Mathematics curriculum has considered the desired outcomes of education for learners at the basic level. Mathematics is also concerned with the development of attitudes and is important for all citizens to be mathematically and technologically literate for sustainable development. Mathematics therefore ought to be taught using hands-on and minds-on approaches which learners will find as fun and adopt as a culture. Ghana believes that an effective Mathematics education needed for sustainable development should be inquiry-based (NaCCA, Ministry of Education 2019) [2]. Thus Mathematics education must provide learners with opportunities to expand, change, enhance and modify the ways in which they view the world. It should be pivoted on learner-centred Mathematics teaching and learning approaches that engage learners physically and cognitively in the knowledge-acquiring process in a rich and rigorous inquiry-driven environment. www.ijasre.net Page 104 DOI: 10.31695/IJASRE.2020.33766 International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering (ijasre), Vol 6 (3), March -2020 Mathematics learning is an active contextualised process of constructing knowledge based on learners‟ experiences rather than acquiring it. Learners are information constructors who operate as researchers. Teachers serve as facilitators by providing the enabling environment that promotes the construction of learners‟ own knowledge based on their previous experiences. This makes learning more relevant to learners and leads to the development of critical thinkers and problem solvers. The curriculum is aimed at developing individuals to become mathematically literate, good problem solvers who are capable to think creatively and have both the confidence and competence to participate fully in the Ghanaian society as responsible local and global citizens. The core competencies for Mathematics describe a body of skills that teachers in Mathematics at all levels should seek to develop in their learners. They are ways in which teachers and learners in Mathematics engage with the subject matter as they learn the subject. The competencies presented here describe a connected body of core skills that are acquired throughout the processes of teaching and learning. Geometry is one of the longest established branches of mathematics. It has an extensive range of applications and repository of historical and cultural background. Geometry has been accorded a central place in mathematical education in Western culture for a considerable period of time. One of the major achievements of classical geometry was the systematic collection by Euclid of the geometrical knowledge of the ancient Greeks. This has, until comparatively recently, formed the basis for much of the geometry taught in schools. During a period of educational reforms in mathematics in the 1950s and 1960s some new syllabuses (sometimes called „the new maths‟) were developed where the emphasis was on formal structures which were predominantly algebraic. At the same time, the range of approaches to geometry was broadened from its traditional Euclidean base (which was reduced in depth) to include the use of transformations, vectors, matrices and some topology. In recent years many countries have been reviewing the aims, content and approach of their geometry curricula. The 1995 study by the International Commission on Mathematics Instruction (ICMI) [Mammana and Villani, 1998] revealed that no clear consensus was emerging about the outcome of these reviews, [3]. The small scale research study into the geometry curricula of a number of countries commissioned in 2000 by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) for England confirmed this. Against this background this study considered the rationale for a geometry curriculum, its possible content and issues concerned with its effective teaching. Our report sets out a number of recommendations on issues where the working group reached a consensus view. There are some matters on which the working group did not address nor reach a conclusion, and which others may wish to pursue further. In order to help identify major issues raised, the report structured around a number of agreed Key Principles and recommendations. These are presented together with explanations, supporting arguments and, where available, evidence. Within the standard based curriculum, measurement and geometry are merged together as a strand which is internationally accepted; The National Numeracy Strategy (DfEE, 1998) in the United Kingdom, which is also widely used internationally, and several other countries and regions including Hungary, Italy, Alberta (Canada), and British Columbia (Canada), group the two together in a strand called Space, Shape and Measures or similar [4], [5]. While we are used to considering measurement as a category of its own, grouping it with geometry in this way does resolve several issues with regard to certain topics. For example, when measuring area, clearly the geometric properties of shapes should be brought to bear. Angle, similarly, does not fit fully within either measurement or geometry; when referring to angle as a property of a shape we place it within geometry, but when measuring with a protractor, clearly measurement is more appropriate. Time, money and estimation are also topics that are often included within the scope of the www.ijasre.net Page 105 DOI: 10.31695/IJASRE.2020.33766 International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering (ijasre), Vol 6 (3), March -2020 measurement strand, but which could be seen as more logically positioned within the number strand (estimation is currently placed within number in the Ghanaian curriculum) as their use is largely focussed around number rather than measurement. The strand Geometry and Measurement in the Ghanaian standards based curriculum consists of; Lines and Shapes Position Transformation Measurements Geometrical Reasoning For the purposes of this review however, geometry and measurement is treated separately, with the recommendation that consideration be given to ending their status as separate strands if not now in future for curriculum review. The TIMSS (Trends in Mathematics and Science Study) 2003 framework is intended to describe “important content for learners to have learned in mathematics and science” (Mullis et al., 2003, p. i), [6]. Within the Geometry strand the objectives are grouped into five categories: Lines and angles Two- and three-dimensional shapes Congruence and similarity Locations and spatial relationships Symmetry and transformations 2. THEORETICAL AND CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES OF CONCEPT FORMATION Mathematics education researchers have addressed the issue of mathematics concept formation from different perspectives according to Skemp‟s (1987) and Burn‟s (1992) explanation of concept formation in Mathematics. Skemp (1987) emphasizes the need to provide children with known experiences in the process of mathematical concept formation [7]. Burns (1992) stresses the importance of children‟s experience in the real world in the learning of mathematical concepts, [8]. He explains further that children attain equilibrium when their understanding is based on reality rather than perception and that there is a continuous interaction between mental conceptual structures and environment at the state of equilibrium. The implication here therefore is that children‟s previous experiences play a vital role in the successful formation of mathematical concepts. Burns (1992) further suggests three other factors that influence learners‟ mathematics learning, these being maturity, physical experience and social interaction, and the “process of equilibrium coordinates these three factors” (p.28), [9]. A look at the literature by Skemp and Burns show that even though both of them mentioned the need for previous knowledge in the process of concept formation, the former‟s explanation of prior knowledge did not make the issue of culture explicit. Concept formation therefore seems to concentrate on factors that are internal to the learner (learner‟s cognition, maturation etc) with no emphasis on the culture (Piaget, 1953, 1954; Inhelder & Piaget, 1958), [10-13]. This approach to concept formation seems to influence the Ghanaian system very much. The tendency is that in the process of mathematics concept formation the communicator of the concept may emphasize the innate ability of the learner and neglect social and cultural factors, which equally play vital roles in the process of concept formation (Vygotsky, 1987),[14]. A look at a lesson observation on the teaching of perimeter as reported by Mereku (2004) succinctly describes a typical situation in curriculum delivery in the Ghanaian classroom, [15]. In this lesson Mereku www.ijasre.net Page 106 DOI: 10.31695/IJASRE.2020.33766
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.