132x Filetype PDF File size 1.28 MB Source: files.eric.ed.gov
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 472 652 FL 027 593 AUTHOR Jordan, Sherilynn Nidever TITLE Forensic Linguistics: The Linguistic Analyst and Expert Witness of Language Evidence in Criminal Trials. PUB DATE 2002-08-00 NOTE 159p.; A thesis presented to the Faculty of the School of Intercultural Studies, Department of TESOL and Applied Linguistics, Biola University. PUB TYPE Dissertations/Theses - Masters Theses (042) -- Speeches /Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Crime; *Criminal Law; Ethics; *Evidence (Legal); *Forensic Sciences; *Linguistics IDENTIFIERS Expert Witness; Forensic Psychology; Trials ABSTRACT Forensic linguistics (FL) provides consultation to lawyers through the analysis of language evidence during the pre-trial investigation. Evidence commonly analyzed by linguists in criminal cases includes transcripts of police interviews and language crimes (such as bribery) and anonymous or questioned texts. Forensic linguistic testimony is rarely admitted into courts of law, however. A major reason for this is apparently impressionistic methods, which are examined for their objectivity. A further barrier to legal acceptance is that FL experts, like all experts testifying in court, support the claims of whichever side has hired them. Nonetheless, forensic linguists have an ethical and professional responsibility to provide the legal community with reliable and admissible information and help prevent unfair conviction or acquittal of criminal defendants. Legal acceptance of FL expertise should increase as methods improve and as forensic linguists adapt to legal norms. This thesis includes five parts: (1) "The Field of Forensic Linguistics"; (2) "The Evidence Forensic Linguists Analyze"; (3) "The Need to Improve Credibility in the Legal Community"; (4) "Professional and Ethical Issues and Responsibilities for Forensic Linguists"; and (5) "The Future of Forensic Linguistics." Anthrax letters are appenddd. (Contains 92 references.) (SM) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. FORENSIC LINGUISTICS: THE LINGUISTIC ANALYST AND EXPERT WITNESS OF LANGUAGE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS A Thesis Presented to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION the Faculty of the School of Intercultural Studies Office of Educational Research and Improvement ED ATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Department of TESOL and Applied Linguistics This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to Biola University improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND document do not necessarily represent DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS official OERI position or policy. BEEN GRANTED BY In Partial Fulfillment TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) of the Requirements for the Degree 1 Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics by Sherilynn Nidever Jordan August 2002 BST COPYMA1 6 ABSTRACT FORENSIC LINGUISTICS: THE LINGUISTIC ANALYST AND EXPERT WITNESS OF LANGUAGE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS Sherilynn Nidever Jordan Forensic Linguistics provides consultation to lawyers through the analysis of language evidence during the pre-trial investigation. Evidence commonly analyzed by linguists in criminal cases includes transcripts of police interviews and language crimes (such as bribery) and anonymous or questioned texts. Forensic linguistic testimony is rarely admitted into courts of law, however. A major reason for this is apparently impressionistic methods, which are examined for their objectivity. A further barrier to legal acceptance is that FL experts, like all experts testifying in court, support the claims of whichever side has hired them. Nonetheless, forensic linguists have an ethical and professional responsibility to provide as thorough and objective analyses as possible in order to provide the legal community with reliable and admissible information and help prevent unfair conviction or acquittal of criminal defendants. Legal acceptance of FL expertise should increase as methods improve and as forensic linguists adapt to legal norms. FORENSIC LINGUISTICS: THE LINGUISTIC ANALYST AND EXPERT WITNESS OF LANGUAGE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS BY Sherilynn Nidever Jordan APPROVED: 4/VLAk Plit4",dk_ s a1 Dr. Herbert C. Purnell Chair, Thesis Committee 4f, Dr. Stephen Baf6er Member, Thesis Committee Mr. Walter Lewis Member, Thesis Committee APPROVED: v t, Dr. F. Dougla Pennoyer Date Dean, School of Intercultural Studies
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.